Comments on: Converting Ticks to a Timestamp http://drewjoh.com/blog/2009/05/converting-ticks-to-a-timestamp/ Wed, 12 May 2010 08:38:57 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1 By: Drew http://drewjoh.com/blog/2009/05/converting-ticks-to-a-timestamp/comment-page-1/#comment-4725 Drew Mon, 19 Oct 2009 03:28:17 +0000 http://drewjoh.com/blog/?p=57#comment-4725 Hi Tai, I didn't actually keep the code I used to get the number, sorry! From what I remember, it should account for the missing two weeks (I do remember looking that up and reading about it on Wikipedia). I took it out of the code after getting the number to speed up the script, so that I'm not recalculating that number every time. I'll be sure to keep things like that commented in the code in the future! Hi Tai,

I didn’t actually keep the code I used to get the number, sorry! From what I remember, it should account for the missing two weeks (I do remember looking that up and reading about it on Wikipedia).

I took it out of the code after getting the number to speed up the script, so that I’m not recalculating that number every time. I’ll be sure to keep things like that commented in the code in the future!

]]> By: tai viinikka http://drewjoh.com/blog/2009/05/converting-ticks-to-a-timestamp/comment-page-1/#comment-4724 tai viinikka Mon, 19 Oct 2009 02:38:45 +0000 http://drewjoh.com/blog/?p=57#comment-4724 So, if it was tricky to calculate "the number of ticks between 0001-01-01 to 1970-01-01" can you save us the work and just reveal the answer? And I assume you took into account the missing two weeks between the Gregorian and Julian calendars? :) Cheers. tai / eastpole So, if it was tricky to calculate “the number of ticks between 0001-01-01 to 1970-01-01″ can you save us the work and just reveal the answer? And I assume you took into account the missing two weeks between the Gregorian and Julian calendars? :)

Cheers.
tai / eastpole

]]>